When the Cradle Stays Empty: Grief is Different for Everyone

Fahmida  Fahmida; Laiba Qayyum; Mirrat Gul Butt

doi:10.63050/jpps.22.03.1064

Fahmida Fahmida Assistant Professor, Gynaecology Unit 4, Bolan Medical College/BMCH, Quetta, Pakistan.
Laiba Qayyum King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9880-0199
Mirrat Gul Principal Clinical Psychologist at Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Sciences, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0524-9468

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63050/jpps.22.03.1064

Keywords: Grief, Depression, Anxiety, Psychological stress, Miscarriage, Women, Mother, Pakistan

Abstract

Objective: To explore women's experiences of perinatal grief, depression, anxiety, and stress across various personal and social factors.

Study Design: Cross-sectional survey design.

Place & Duration of study: The present study was conducted online over four months from November 2024 to February 2025.

Subjects and Methods: The Fountain House Institute for Mental Health, Lahore, approved the study. A sample size of 139 women (aged 18-55) who had recently experienced a miscarriage was calculated through an online software by Raosoft Inc. A purposive sampling technique was used. Data were collected through an Urdu questionnaire, including an informed consent form, a demographic information sheet, the Perinatal Grief Scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Informed consent was taken from the participants before the study. Anonymity and confidentiality of all research data were ensured. Data were analysed using the statistical software SPSS 27.

Results: Independent samples t-tests showed that women who reported satisfaction with their relationship had significantly lower scores on perinatal grief, depression, and anxiety. Similarly, women who reported satisfaction with their home environment scored lower on perinatal grief, depression, anxiety, and stress, and those who experienced emotional problems after miscarriage had significantly higher scores on all measures. One-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences in our study measures across three marital status groups: married, divorced, and widowed.

Conclusion: Women differ in their experiences of perinatal grief, depression, anxiety, and stress based on their satisfaction with relationships with their husbands, perceived family support, home environment, marital status, and emotional vulnerabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Asim M, Karim S, Khwaja H, Hameed W, Saleem S. The unspoken grief of multiple stillbirths in rural Pakistan: an interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):45.
2. Mota C, Sánchez C, Carreño J, Gómez ME. Paternal Experiences of Perinatal Loss-A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6).
3. Youngblut JM, Brooten D, Glaze J, Promise T, Yoo C. Parent Grief 1-13 Months After Death in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units. J Loss Trauma. 2017;22(1):77-96.
4. Herbert D, Young K, Pietrusińska M, MacBeth A. The mental health impact of perinatal loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;297:118-29.
5. Leon IG. Psychodynamics of perinatal loss. Psychiatry. 1986;49(4):312-24.
6. Zafar F, Javaid R. The Journey of Grief: Exploring Gender Differences and Social Support, Following the Death of Significant Others. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies. 2025;3:917-31.
7. Silverman GS, Aurélien B, and Hemer SR. Culture and grief: Ethnographic perspectives on ritual, relationships and remembering. Death Stud. 2021;45(1):1-8.
8. Janssen HJ, Cuisinier MC, de Graauw KP, Hoogduin KA. A prospective study of risk factors predicting grief intensity following pregnancy loss. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54(1):56-61.
9. Lasker J, Toedter L. Predicting Outcomes after Pregnancy Loss: Results from Studies Using the Perinatal Grief Scale. Illn Crises Loss. 2000;8:350-72.
10. Raosoft I. Sample Size Calculator by Raosoft, Inc. 2004.
11. Potvin L, Lasker J, Toedter L. Measuring grief: A short version of the Perinatal Grief Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 1989;11(1):29-45.
12. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44(2):227-39.
13. Smid GE. A framework of meaning attribution following loss. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020;11(1):1776563.
14. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310.
15. Roberts LR, J. RS, Shreeletha S, and Montgomery S. Perinatal Grief Among Poor Rural and Urban Women in Central India. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:305-15.
16. Wendołowska A, Kiełek-Rataj E, Kalus A, Czyżowska D. Perceived Partner's Self-Control and Social Support Effects on Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Experiencing Infertility or Miscarriage: Dyadic Analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4).
17. Taylor SE, Brown JD. Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(2):193.
18. Eisma MC, Stroebe MS. Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review. Behav Ther. 2021;52(1):234-49.
19. Cacciatore J, Thieleman K, Fretts R, Jackson LB. What is good grief support? Exploring the actors and actions in social support after traumatic grief. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0252324.
20. Zhang X, Chen Y, Zhao M, Yuan M, Zeng T, Wu M. Complicated grief following the perinatal loss: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):772.